On 02/21/2014 03:34 AM, Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> On Friday 21 February 2014 11:47:05 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
>> On Friday, February 21, 2014 09:22:52 Stuart Jarvis wrote:
>>> "developed in a European Union funded research project"
>>> would become
>>> "developed in a European Union funded research project (NEPOMUK)".
>>
>> imo not only should Nepomuk be mentioned in this fasion for the reasons
>> Stuart mentions, but the word =93external=94 should be dropped from the
>> sentence. External to what? (We know, will the reader? Doubtful..) Does =
it
>> matter to the story? No.
>>
>> Introducing an unclear distinction is a distraction, and as it is
>> unnecessary should be removed.
>>
>> I=92ve also cleared up some grammar issues in the text (which don=92t af=
fect
>> meaning)
> We hacked on it together and besides having good fun due to our various
> locations and lag, I think we improved the text. As far as I am concerned=
 I
> feel it is good to go. Nepomuk is now mentioned but I think it is done in=
 the
> right way and context: it was the EU project. We suggest 'our' Semantic S=
earch
> is separate.
>
> All good with it this way?
>

Sounds good. It reads well, reports accurately and gives praise where due.

I particularly like the way that we worked our way to a consensus =

announcement.

Carl

_______________________________________________
This message is from the kde-promo mailing list.

Visit https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-promo to unsubscribe, set d=
igest on or temporarily stop your subscription.