From kde-panel-devel Sun Jun 08 01:30:32 2008 From: Sebastian Kuegler Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 01:30:32 +0000 To: kde-panel-devel Subject: Re: xrandr Message-Id: <200806080330.33025.sebas () kde ! org> X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-panel-devel&m=121288868505992 MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============1707351369==" --===============1707351369== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart16635362.5j3AbRjlR9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --nextPart16635362.5j3AbRjlR9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday 07 June 2008 14:42:17 Marco Martin wrote: > On Saturday 07 June 2008, Aaron J. Seigo wrote: > > the big remaining issue is going from a full screen panel on a large re= s, > > to a smaller res, then back to a larger res. > > > > what happens is that in the larger res (call it R(0)) we have a panel > > 100% width. in the lower res (R(1)) the panel is smashed down to the > > right size. so far so good. > > > > but on return to R(0) we no longer know at that point in time what R(1) > > was! i think we're going to need to keep the last seen screen geometry = in > > PanelView. > > > > Marco: i'd like to chat various solutions over with you, since you've > > been working on resize and what not of late. > > hmm, don't know if i like keeping the ratios, if i have configured a size > don't know if i would like it should be automatically changed, also becau= se > =A0 if i configure a certain size less than 100% it's probably more relat= ed > to the size and number of the applets than on how the screen is big. > now probably it's natural to keep the size 100% because it basically means > it was not configured and becoming not 100% would be weird? > but that said i also don't know what could feel more natural, i only know > in every way we do there will always be bug reports that asks the exact > opposite, quite inevitable :) As a user, I'd expect a full-width panel to stay that way when I change the= =20 resolution. Full-width panel has one major feature over others, it has to=20 locations that have an indefinite click target area in the corners. In othe= r=20 words, it would be very bad if the user is used to throwing the mouse in th= e=20 bottom left corner, and that suddenly doesn't work because he switched to a= =20 higher resolution. I think in the cases of non-full-width panel, 'the right thing' depends on = the=20 following: =2D if the panel is centered, it should stay that way =2D if a panel is aligned to one of the edges, it should grow from this edge =2D changing the size probably only makes sense when the panel is full-width =2D vertical panels should move to the screen border, and not start floatin= g=20 around =2D panels should not start overlapping each other after resolution change Cool to see xrandr issues being addressed, I ran into those during Linuxtag. =2D-=20 sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9=20 --nextPart16635362.5j3AbRjlR9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUASEs2OGdNh9WRGQ75AQKisAf/WKFJG8XUDPM8WtEnJhlMidnDgOun81vA NnQ2L5r5zELHZKl1GlhVxuMjvq4QfPmC90u9AoVbRsvtZm9V6AskOgeHgqQhPVHJ 13JlI4EaI4ciIYBvDCJM39RyVcY2QM195Ko/taaldVHf43RUwPowQMX4C/3Wr8zM g0fxJfvOpF/HbEWszhtkIh8zZBAgWjHFgGsJDRftunFkFBL1XQ26CVb+mui+gz2X 0K2mcXzjqTFsEyWl3KcgJi8JkAHCQihW6QL5xptpD+Sxb92dIhLulCZpwLCLPWST O/roaB1R2/KD8psAKlSZ148Ly1dWVzgln42JHtza+Oobu7cgMpBsNQ== =2kNw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart16635362.5j3AbRjlR9-- --===============1707351369== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Panel-devel mailing list Panel-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/panel-devel --===============1707351369==--