[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-licensing
Subject:    Re: Academic Free License 2.1 + GPLv2+ code in kdelibs?
From:       Ingo =?iso-8859-15?q?Kl=F6cker?= <kloecker () kde ! org>
Date:       2009-03-28 22:10:42
Message-ID: 200903282310.59933 () thufir ! ingo-kloecker ! de
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On Saturday 28 March 2009, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> A Dissabte, 28 de març de 2009, Ingo Klöcker va escriure:
> > On Saturday 28 March 2009, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > > Hi, to sort a i18n problem in current solid i'd like to reuse
> > > some libhal- storage code, the "problem" is that the code is
> > > licensed under Academic Free License 2.1 + GPLv2+
> > >
> > > And that is not a listed license in
> > >   http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy
> > > so i'd like to ask wheter it's ok even if it's not listed there
> > > (it seems noone really has problems linking to libhal) or if i
> > > should ask the author for permission to relincese under one of
> > > our approved licenses.
> >
> > According to
> > http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLIncompatibleLic
> >enses the Academic Free License 2.1 is incompatible with the GNU
> > GPL. Therefore I'd say the Academic Free License 2.1 is not ok.
>
> I think you did not undersand me, the code is both licensed under
> Academic Free License 2.1 AND GPLv2+

You asked "wheter it's ok even if it's not listed there" and I answered 
that I do not think it's ok. With respect to the code also being 
licensed under GPLv2+, we cannot incorporate code released under the 
GPL into the LGPL licensed solid.

So, yes, you should ask the author to relicense the code under the LGPL.


Regards,
Ingo

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Kde-licensing mailing list
Kde-licensing@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-licensing


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]