[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-kimageshop
Subject: Re: Action plan 2
From: Sven Langkamp <sven.langkamp () gmail ! com>
Date: 2010-05-20 17:16:03
Message-ID: AANLkTildzt5Le9sHmMqy8a-WbTaeDRu83cxpAG3oGyw3 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Cyrille Berger <cberger@cberger.net>wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 May 2010, Sven Langkamp wrote:
> > Even the Krita behaviour isn't very logical. Why do I have to erase on
> the
> > transparency mask to hide some area?
> Well I mentioned that the ability to paint transparency would be a nice
> feature, didn't I ? As for logic, well without a mask you use the eraser to
> hide some area, so that means masks would work the same way as normal
> layer.
>
You erase on the mask, so the erase should make a hole into the mask where
the layer shines through.
> > Transparency is needed to indicate that a certain piece of the mask
> > shouldn't be affected. For example if you have a mask and I want the top
> > less selected, the middle unchanged and the bottom more select, then I
> > could control the changed area with the alpha channel while the other
> > "color" channel would control the direction (more or less selected) of
> the
> > change.
> I don't understand what you mean. You want a two channels masks ?
>
No, the result is still one channel but the gradient would have two
channels.
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Cyrille Berger \
<span dir="ltr"><<a \
href="mailto:cberger@cberger.net">cberger@cberger.net</a>></span> \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; \
border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> <div class="im">On \
Wednesday 19 May 2010, Sven Langkamp wrote:<br> > Even the Krita behaviour \
isn't very logical. Why do I have to erase on the<br> > transparency mask to \
hide some area?<br> </div>Well I mentioned that the ability to paint transparency \
would be a nice<br> feature, didn't I ? As for logic, well without a mask you use \
the eraser to<br> hide some area, so that means masks would work the same way as \
normal layer.<br><div class="im"></div></blockquote><div><br>You erase on the mask, \
so the erase should make a hole into the mask where the layer shines through.<br> \
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: \
1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im"> > Transparency \
is needed to indicate that a certain piece of the mask<br> > shouldn't be \
affected. For example if you have a mask and I want the top<br> > less selected, \
the middle unchanged and the bottom more select, then I<br> > could control the \
changed area with the alpha channel while the other<br> > "color" \
channel would control the direction (more or less selected) of the<br> > \
change.<br> </div>I don't understand what you mean. You want a two channels masks \
?<br></blockquote><div><br>No, the result is still one channel but the gradient would \
have two channels. <br></div></div>
_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic