[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-kimageshop
Subject: RE: Photographic features and other non-paint features)
From: "Ed ." <schumifer () hotmail ! com>
Date: 2010-03-02 8:29:17
Message-ID: BAY112-W3108BC1CC1414597844F3AB73B0 () phx ! gbl
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
Regarding the removal of some filters, I think only filters that do not work or are \
overly slow should be removed. They do not clutter the interface and so the more, the \
merrier as long as they work. IMHO pixelize, oilpaint and emboss should be retained. \
The rest in your removal list are pretty useless.
> From: cberger@cberger.net
> To: kimageshop@kde.org
> Subject: Photographic features and other non-paint features)
> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:30:55 +0100
>
> Hello,
>
> Lets start the list of (purely) photographic related features:
> * lens correction
> * tone mapping
> * bracketing to HDR layer
> * Gaussian / Wavelet noise reduction
>
> And the list of filters that I don't think are so useful for our vision:
> * cubism
> * pixelize
> * raindrop
> * oilpaint
> * emboss ?
> * small tiles
> * round corner
>
> If you disagree with that list, or if you want to add something, feel free to
> tell it :)
>
> Also I had like to delay their removal until I have setup a proper
> infrastructure to host extensions (more about that in a mail), which would
> probably mean remove them after 2.2.
>
> --
> Cyrille Berger
> _______________________________________________
> kimageshop mailing list
> kimageshop@kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
Regarding the removal of some filters, I think only filters that do not work or are \
overly slow should be removed. They do not clutter the interface and so the more, the \
merrier as long as they work. IMHO pixelize, oilpaint and emboss should be retained. \
The rest in your removal list are pretty useless.<br><br>> From: \
cberger@cberger.net<br>> To: kimageshop@kde.org<br>> Subject: Photographic \
features and other non-paint features)<br>> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:30:55 \
+0100<br>> <br>> Hello,<br>> <br>> Lets start the list of (purely) \
photographic related features:<br>> * lens correction<br>> * tone \
mapping<br>> * bracketing to HDR layer<br>> * Gaussian / Wavelet noise \
reduction<br>> <br>> And the list of filters that I don't think are so useful \
for our vision:<br>> * cubism<br>> * pixelize<br>> * raindrop<br>> * \
oilpaint<br>> * emboss ?<br>> * small tiles<br>> * round corner<br>> \
<br>> If you disagree with that list, or if you want to add something, feel free \
to <br>> tell it :)<br>> <br>> Also I had like to delay their removal until \
I have setup a proper <br>> infrastructure to host extensions (more about that in \
a mail), which would <br>> probably mean remove them after 2.2.<br>> <br>> \
-- <br>> Cyrille Berger<br>> \
_______________________________________________<br>> kimageshop mailing \
list<br>> kimageshop@kde.org<br>> \
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop<br> <br /><hr />Hotmail: \
Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection. <a \
href='https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969' target='_new'>Sign up \
now.</a></body> </html>
_______________________________________________
kimageshop mailing list
kimageshop@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kimageshop
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic