[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-devel
Subject: Re: Question for Kmail developers
From: Daniel Karlsson <chaotica () home ! se>
Date: 2001-01-29 16:02:09
[Download RAW message or body]
On Sunday 28 January 2001 23:19, Michael Häckel wrote:
> If you saw off a branch of a real tree, then the branch also falls to
> the ground and doesn't remain on the tree. I consider that behavior
> correct. The rest of the mails simply doesn't contain the required
> information any more. It seems that Netscape does threading according
> to the subject and only groups the mails together. KMail does threading
> according to the message id and can display the real tree, how the
> replies belong to each other.
Since the message ids are known from the "References" header, how about
using virtual messages. I.e.
[Unknown message: <msgid@host>]
+- Re: Some subject
Ideally, the whole tree could be reconstructed, even if many messages are
gone (or delayed). If the "References" header is missing or broken,
fallback to "In-Reply-To" could at least reconstruct some parts of the
tree.
Regards,
--
Daniel Karlsson <chaotica@home.se>
>> Visit http://master.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic