[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: CORBA on kde-core-devel
From:       "Michael J. Bedy" <mjbedy () mtu ! edu>
Date:       1999-09-17 16:24:25
[Download RAW message or body]


  I would like to lend my support to keeping the seperate process model
that is used now. Quite simply, it's the more stable approach, as well as
the most flexable.

  I've got a three year old computer, and it seems fast enough for me.
Beyond the point of speed, I'm not sure what other arguments are to be
made against the current approach.

  - Mike


On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Martin Konold wrote:

> 
> > On Fri, 17 Sep 1999, Bavo De Ridder wrote:
> 
> > > encourages the use of DCOM over COM for the very simple reason that DCOM
> > > offers you more stable programs (a crashing COM extention of IIS won't
> > > bring down IIS as a whole).
> 
> This is my main concern. Imagin me clicking on a URL and because konquerer
> thinks it is very intelligent tries to load some alpha quality code in
> order to display an image or play some unneeded sound. A shlib approach
> would kill the complete konquerer instead os simply producing a garbage
> picture or playing unpleasant sound. 
> 
> Regards,
> -- martin
> 
> // Martin Konold, Herrenbergerstr. 14, 72070 Tuebingen, Germany  //
> KDE:  A stable GUI for a reliable OS.
> 

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]