[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: suffix stuff argument for the idl compiler in am_edit
From:       David Faure <david.faure () insa-lyon ! fr>
Date:       1999-06-09 19:47:34
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Jun 09, 1999 at 09:43:51PM +0200, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> Hi (Stephan :),
> 
> I just switched to new mico 2.2.7 and noticed that the two options
> --c++-suffix and --h-suffix (which are both added by am_edit) 
> "disappeared" from the list of supported aruments of 2.2.7's idl compiler,
> thus breaking compilation.

Any idea why they removed the options ?

> => Do we need these options? Is it safe to remove them, so that both
> mico's can be used? Or is there a workaround available?

They control the extension of the generated files, right ?
Can you try without the option and see how the generated files are
named ?
> 
> P.S.: Two nice figures from the 2.2.7's ChangeLog:
>       - improved oneway performance over IIOP by 100%
Do we use many oneway calls ?
Ah, signal/slots are oneway, I suppose.

>       - some performance optimizations (about 30% faster according to
>         demo/bench)
Great :)

-- 
David FAURE
david.faure@insa-lyon.fr, faure@kde.org
http://www.insa-lyon.fr/People/AEDI/dfaure/index.html 
KDE, Making The Future of Computing Available Today

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]