[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: unknown .kdelnk field
From:       <pbrown () redhat ! com>
Date:       1999-05-04 17:52:54
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, 4 May 1999, David Faure wrote:

> But it allows to enter several entries ("netscape", "Netscape",
> "Communicator" (?), whatever), because it's handled like a mimetype.
> I think this is wrong.
> Let's rename this field to simply "Application", allow a single entry in
> it, and we're done.
> 
> Did I miss something ?

I don't think so.  Makes sense to me.  However, Application is still a
misleading name.  Let's call it AppBinary?

---
  Preston Brown                                    Systems Engineer
  pbrown@redhat.com                                Red Hat Software, Inc. 

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]