From kde-devel  Fri Mar 19 13:49:48 2010
From: Dario Freddi <drf54321 () gmail ! com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:49:48 +0000
To: kde-devel
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerdevil-remove-cpufreq.patch
Message-Id: <201003191449.48862.drf54321 () gmail ! com>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-devel&m=126900681911224
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--===============0816800973=="

--===============0816800973==
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  boundary="nextPart1363651.m3f2NbKFae";
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

--nextPart1363651.m3f2NbKFae
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Friday 19 March 2010 14:39:29 Holger Macht wrote:
> On Fri 19. Mar - 14:30:44, Dario Freddi wrote:
> > On Friday 19 March 2010 14:25:58 Sebastian K=FCgler wrote:
> > > On Friday 19 March 2010 14:18:34 Dario Freddi wrote:
> > > >   On Friday 19 March 2010 14:02:47 Sebastian K=FCgler wrote:
> > > > > I was assuming that you had an SVN account, and was waiting for
> > > > > Dario to have a look. If he likes it, I'm happy to commit. :)
> > > >=20
> > > > P.S.: I actually like it. But I do also recognize that some people
> > > > might have  full control. Those people surely know how to edit text
> > > > files.
> > >=20
> > > Isn't it a lot easier (and even doable in the UI) to specify this as
> > > "run this command when switched to profile")? IMO this is the exact
> > > reason why that option is there in the first place.
> >=20
> > Possibly. However, this might require root privileges if done from a
> > terminal, isn't it? Otherwise yes, it can be completely ok.
>=20
> No root privileges are required. At least not when using the HAL
> interface which Solid does.

Ok, then a good approach would be keeping the solid-powermanagement shell=20
alive with that setting enabled and tell people who want to switch their=20
profile to use a script.

>=20
> > P.S.: Has there been any testing for this patch, BTW?
>=20
> Of course I tested it myself, no idea about further tests.

Sebastian, if you have 2 minutes to test it out, could you please apply it =
to=20
your local copy and test? If it works fine it's totally ok for me to go in,=
=20
and you can commit it straight.

>=20
> Regards,
>  Holger
>=20
> >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to
> >> unsubscribe <<

=2D-=20
=2D------------------

Dario Freddi
KDE Developer
GPG Key Signature: 511A9A3B

--nextPart1363651.m3f2NbKFae
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc 
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkujgPwACgkQaqeZcVEamjuvXACfZKuc7Pdn7hsPf3vShBN26p5p
CVkAn2D71vGLV0fjAmcvFLVpIw6c9RKb
=Fman
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1363651.m3f2NbKFae--

--===============0816800973==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

--===============0816800973==--