[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-devel
Subject:    Re: pkg-config, glib2 etc.
From:       "Manuel Amador (Rudd-O)" <amadorm () usm ! edu ! ec>
Date:       2003-03-18 20:24:03
[Download RAW message or body]

>
>
>   It requires developers to learn glib, and to mix glib and qt containers.  
>It also adds more code and external dependencies, when the developers could 
>be using Qt in the first place.  The code in KDE that is being proposed to 
>use glib or already using glib also happens to be code that is severely under 
>developed and quite problematic.  That means that other developers are 
>regularily maintaining the code.
>
>   I don't have any intentions of fixing the bugs in glib code.  Do you?  And 
>are you willing to put that in writing and follow through on it?  As 
>developers, we signed up for a Qt based project, not a glib based project.  I 
>don't care if it's called klib even.  The fact that it has a g there is not 
>an issue.
>
Why, then, do the ARTS people use glib?

 
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]