--nextPart1476872.JECTkGrkUJ
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thursday, 17. February 2005 14:50, Stephan Kulow wrote:
> Am Thursday 17 February 2005 14:38 schrieb Stefan Teleman:
> > What i am trying to say is: given the fact that the primary
> > development OS is Linux, and that there are also FreeBSD and Solaris
> > KDE sites: in case i need to patch something for Solaris, but it
> > won't work on Linux, or FreeBSD: can we work together and find a
> > common solution, in these tricky cases ? i am very much aware that in
> > certain cases, that won't be possible, and in certain other cases
> > that won't even be necessary (for example, memory_solaris.cpp).
>
> And you're saying so far we always rejected any kind of help to port
> KDE to FreeBSD and Solaris?

I guess it can be kinda hard to push compatibility fixes (like additional=20
configure-checks, #ifdefs in code, etc etc) into KDE if you don't have a CV=
S=20
account or can't spam somebody who does with patches on an almost 24/7-basi=
s=20
(like I do with adridg :). But then, my impression is that KDE isn't that=20
picky in handing out commit-bits, so perhaps you should just ask, Stefan=20
(T.)? You're the Solaris packager dude after all.

=2D-=20
   ,_,   | Michael Nottebrock               | lofi@freebsd.org
 (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve     | http://www.freebsd.org
   \u/   | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org

--nextPart1476872.JECTkGrkUJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBCFLEMXhc68WspdLARAlwNAJ4w1XfrycpaxoYyXUT+02JW38tv+QCgib4s
VwrSRb5FHqurPgZlMS7S87U=
=LMls
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart1476872.JECTkGrkUJ--