From kde-core-devel  Tue Feb 15 17:47:07 2005
From: Christoph Cullmann <cullmann () babylon2k ! de>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:47:07 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Build system (was Re: Future of KDE Development)
Message-Id: <200502151847.11129 () cullmann>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=110848958432680
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart2625590.HDjPZp269p"

--nextPart2625590.HDjPZp269p
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday 15 February 2005 17:11, mETz wrote:
> Ugh, I don't want to learn _any_ new language. all I want is set a few va=
rs
> and be done (i.e. like Makefile.am or qmake projects work right now) and
> I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one with this opinion. Coding C++ is
> complex enough, don't make it even more confusing with weird
> script-languages like perl or python.
I don't think settings some vars in a sane language like python will hurt m=
ore=20
than using some seldom other config language, and normal makefiles won't=20
contain much more python logic, or? and more difficult makefiles will still=
=20
be consistent to write, without many different dialects for makefiles, conf=
ig=20
checks, ....

cu
Christoph

=2D-=20
Christoph Cullmann
KDE Developer, kde.org Maintainance Team
http://www.babylon2k.de, cullmann@kde.org

--nextPart2625590.HDjPZp269p
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCEjWfyPjDGePm9UIRAtVUAJwId6lyF1HkvegLSFIbPZ/oA/yBPgCdEWZF
168gVRMdC+BnWyAhDmobSIM=
=/A/p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart2625590.HDjPZp269p--