From kde-core-devel  Mon Feb 14 23:49:03 2005
From: Stanislav Karchebny <berk () upnet ! ru>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 23:49:03 +0000
To: kde-core-devel
Subject: Re: Future of KDE Development
Message-Id: <200502150449.03271.berk () upnet ! ru>
X-MARC-Message: https://marc.info/?l=kde-core-devel&m=110842471810467
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="--nextPart110855562.RJb1oc6CjE"

--nextPart110855562.RJb1oc6CjE
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline

On Tuesday 15 February 2005 00:50, Alexander Neundorf wrote:

> > That's why I vote for a KDE 3.5 release.
>
> This sounds very reasonable.
> To keep problems to a minimum, kdelibs should stay frozen except for
> bugfixes, so app developers will never have to update kdelibs to keep the=
ir
> apps working. IOW all 3.5 apps should work with KDE 3.4 too.

I second that. Sounds like a good plan.

=2D-=20
keep in touch. berkus.

Roey on #kde-devel: when I hear best of breed I tune out--it's too much a=20
buzzword. What I carry between my legs is best of breed. And like KDE, just=
=20
because it's less visible doesn't mean it gets less usage.

--nextPart110855562.RJb1oc6CjE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQBCETjv8v4MNv5cuDkRAirZAKCJulWvECH4G27GNJy9b7S+MOI/jwCfVs5X
ttBJ6kk9yEYYzIcOXacG7wo=
=Sa3l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nextPart110855562.RJb1oc6CjE--