[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-community
Subject: Re: Qt, Open Source and corona
From: Sebastian =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FCgler?= <sebas () kde ! org>
Date: 2020-04-09 14:06:05
Message-ID: 1792078.taCxCBeP46 () lava
[Download RAW message or body]
On donderdag 9 april 2020 15:29:22 CEST Noah Davis wrote:
> I've seen a lot of people on Reddit and various chat rooms who are a
> fan of Kt as a name.
I'd advise against this discussion at this point, it doesn't belong here, it's
a topic that can quickly explode, lead to bike-shedding and distracts from the
very serious topic of "what is a good strategy to move forward in this
situation?".
Let's not throw the baby out with the bathwater.
I certainly didn't want to start such a discussion, just answer a question
that tries to draw a line between "what is the part of Qt that can be taken
into a fork, and what is not?", the trademark (just like infrastructure and
quite a few other things) are owned by Qt, not freely licensed and thus
outside of the scope of a fork (so would require investing resources to
replace).
--
sebas
http://vizZzion.org
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic