[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-community
Subject: Re: [kde-community] Proposals for dealing with bad behavior
From: Thomas Zander <zander () kde ! org>
Date: 2013-08-08 10:48:48
Message-ID: 20130808124848.135741n99ohfjlow () thomaszander ! se
[Download RAW message or body]
This message is in MIME format.
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
This message is in MIME format.
I have no idea how I ended up on the mailinglist, but since I am I'll just comment in private.
The document looks to strike the tone that IMO makes sense. The wording in some paragraphs may need \
clarification, but nothing major. (well, the last part mentioning we have 4 principles may qualify).
I think if this was in place during my koffice times, I expect it would not have gotten to a split like \
it did. Some not-aceptable behaviour generated talks with people (not me ;) that were marked as \
"horrible" by cwg members, as such giving them some 'teeth' would be great. Accountability is required, \
as you know, but accountability without repurcussions is useless.
I'm gonna figure out how to unsubscribe from the list now. Have a nice day! :)
Quoting Jos Poortvliet <jospoortvliet@gmail.com>:
> On Friday 02 August 2013 14:44:52 Jos Poortvliet wrote:
> > Dear all,
> >
> > At Akademy, Valery, Peter and myself organized a BoF session about conflict
> > handling. Valery wanted to discuss the situation around mailing list- and
> > IRC moderation; I had a proposal for those few cases (just a handful in the
> > history of our community) when things really go out of hand.
> >
> > I've updated the wiki page with the notes. You can find there two proposals:
> >
> > One to essentially set up a communication channel for the IRC, Forum and
> > Mailing List moderators; and urge them to come up with some kind of process
> > and/or documentation for dealing with unpleasant behavior.
> >
> > The second, the 'stormy day' scenario, is a proposal from myself to allow
> > the CWG to deny people who are unwilling to adapt their behavior to our
> > community access to our infrastructure; initially for a two-week cool-down
> > period but at some point for much longer periods.
> >
> > http://community.kde.org/Akademy/2013/ConflictResolution
> >
> > We would appreciate your feedback. The first step (the communication channel
> > for moderators) is already in the process of being executed; the second
> > proposal will need to be discussed and vote don by the e.V. membership.
> > However, I'd like to invite everybody, members and non-members alike, to
> > comment upon it.
> >
> > Oh and from the others who were present at the BoF, besides a thank you, a
> > request: please check if it is complete and accurate! I might have missed
> > things.
> >
> > Greetings and hugs,
> > Jos Poortvliet
>
> I have seen very few comments on this. Does that mean everybody agrees, it is
> perfect and I can put this up for a vote, which will get 100% approval? It is
> a bit surprising that we got it right after just one round of discussion at
> Akademy, I think we should create proposals there more often ;-)
>
> Greetings,
> J
--
Thomas Zander
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
I have no idea how I ended up on the mailinglist, but since I am I'll just comment in private.<br />The \
document looks to strike the tone that IMO makes sense. The wording in some paragraphs may need \
clarification, but nothing major. (well, the last part mentioning we have 4 principles may qualify).<br \
/><br />I think if this was in place during my koffice times, I expect it would not have gotten to a \
split like it did. Some not-aceptable behaviour generated talks with people (not me ;) that were \
marked as "horrible" by cwg members, as such giving them some 'teeth' would be great. \
Accountability is required, as you know, but accountability without repurcussions is useless.<br /><br \
/>I'm gonna figure out how to unsubscribe from the list now. Have a nice day! :)<br /><br />Quoting Jos \
Poortvliet <jospoortvliet@gmail.com>:<br /> > On Friday 02 August 2013 14:44:52 Jos Poortvliet \
wrote:<br /> >> Dear all,<br />
>><br />
>> At Akademy, Valery, Peter and myself organized a BoF session about conflict<br />
>> handling. Valery wanted to discuss the situation around mailing list- and<br />
>> IRC moderation; I had a proposal for those few cases (just a handful in the<br />
>> history of our community) when things really go out of hand.<br />
>><br />
>> I've updated the wiki page with the notes. You can find there two proposals:<br />
>><br />
>> One to essentially set up a communication channel for the IRC, Forum and<br />
>> Mailing List moderators; and urge them to come up with some kind of process<br />
>> and/or documentation for dealing with unpleasant behavior.<br />
>><br />
>> The second, the 'stormy day' scenario, is a proposal from myself to allow<br />
>> the CWG to deny people who are unwilling to adapt their behavior to our<br />
>> community access to our infrastructure; initially for a two-week cool-down<br />
>> period but at some point for much longer periods.<br />
>><br />
>> <a href="http://community.kde.org/Akademy/2013/ConflictResolution" \
target="_blank">http://community.kde.org/Akademy/2013/ConflictResolution</a><br /> >><br />
>> We would appreciate your feedback. The first step (the communication channel<br />
>> for moderators) is already in the process of being executed; the second<br />
>> proposal will need to be discussed and vote don by the e.V. membership.<br />
>> However, I'd like to invite everybody, members and non-members alike, to<br />
>> comment upon it.<br />
>><br />
>> Oh and from the others who were present at the BoF, besides a thank you, a<br />
>> request: please check if it is complete and accurate! I might have missed<br />
>> things.<br />
>><br />
>> Greetings and hugs,<br />
>> Jos Poortvliet<br />
><br />
> I have seen very few comments on this. Does that mean everybody agrees, it is<br />
> perfect and I can put this up for a vote, which will get 100% approval? It is<br />
> a bit surprising that we got it right after just one round of discussion at<br />
> Akademy, I think we should create proposals there more often ;-)<br />
><br />
> Greetings,<br />
> J<br />
<p> </p>
<p><!--begin_signature-->-- <br />
Thomas Zander<!--end_signature--></p>
_______________________________________________
kde-community mailing list
kde-community@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic