[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bugs-dist
Subject:    Bug#26371: AW: Bug#26371: kfile bug still present !! please check !!
From:       "Ferdinand Gassauer" <f.gassauer () aon ! at>
Date:       2001-08-01 10:50:54
[Download RAW message or body]

Thanks for the fix
 today it works  ;-)
cu
ferdinand

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Carsten Pfeiffer [mailto:carpdjih@cetus.zrz.tu-berlin.de]
> Gesendet am: Dienstag, 31. Juli 2001 17:54
> An: 26371@bugs.kde.org
> Betreff: Bug#26371: kfile bug still present !! please check !!
>
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 05:32:35AM +0200, Ferdinand Gassauer wrote:
> > Hi!
> > I have applied the recent fix from Carsten
>
> did you make install before starting kmail (if that's what you
> tested with)?
> There's a little test program in kfile, you can compile it with
> "make kfstest"
> and run with e.g.
>
> ./kfstest heap
>
> > now open a file and click a column heading to get the list
> sorted - > crash.
>                ^^^dialog you mean?
> E.g. clicking on the heading without selecting a file before?
> That's exactly
> the crash that I fixed with the last patch. And I can't reproduce
> any crash
> anymore. Do you get the exact same backtrace as before?
>
> Which Qt-version do you use?
>
> > using the Extra button to sort the columns work fine. (but who
> is going to do
> > that except for the work around).
>
> Those who don't have a header (e.g. in the simple view).
>
> > After sorting the columns in all directions using the Extra
> button, I can
> > sort the columns (mostly) without a crash using the cloumn headers.
> > Hope that helps.
>
> You probably get a crash when you sort by clicking on the header and no
> file is selected in the view. That's what I fixed with the last patch.
>
> > BTW- IMHO the default presentation of the kfile dialog is
> minimalistic - I
> > didn't realize that, because I changed the setting to something more
> > convenient (for me) long time ago. But that's to late to change.
>
> Well, you get the preview (if available) and the icon view. Some
> might prefer
> the detailed view instead or the directories separated view. To
> each his own,
> I think :)
>
> Cheers
> Carsten Pfeiffer
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]