[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gtk-devel
Subject:    Re: [Discuss] Make a thinner Glib/GTK+ to fit tiny device better
From:       Matthias Clasen <matthias.clasen () gmail ! com>
Date:       2015-10-14 19:16:40
Message-ID: CAFwd_vC3Dzh5cksghBDocgJmL3c5zDb9Pu6HDbWsrLEe1RaFTg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Nicolas Dufresne <
nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com> wrote:

> Le lundi 12 octobre 2015 =C3=A0 23:24 +0800, cee1 a =C3=A9crit :
>
> >
> > 2. I notice EFL use some "COW" logic[1], but we already have a much
> > clean implementation in GStreamer, that's
> > gst_mini_object_make_writable[2]. Then we may merge GstMiniObject
> > back
> > to glib?
>
> We (taking my GStreamer hat) havent heard of any interest from the GLib
> group for lightweight objects. Note that some library ended up also
> having these lightweight kind of object, hence may be interesting to
> eventually consolidate.
>

I think it is fair to say that there is more interest in fixing performance
of GObject than there is in introducing a miniobject type. Not sure if that
qualifies as 'interest in lightweight objects' or not.

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr">On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Nicolas Dufresne <span \
dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com" \
target="_blank">nicolas.dufresne@collabora.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><div \
class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" \
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span \
class="">Le lundi 12 octobre 2015 à 23:24 +0800, cee1 a écrit :<br> </span><span \
class=""><br> &gt;<br>
&gt; 2. I notice EFL use some &quot;COW&quot; logic[1], but we already have a \
much<br> &gt; clean implementation in GStreamer, that&#39;s<br>
&gt; gst_mini_object_make_writable[2]. Then we may merge GstMiniObject<br>
&gt; back<br>
&gt; to glib?<br>
<br>
</span>We (taking my GStreamer hat) havent heard of any interest from the GLib<br>
group for lightweight objects. Note that some library ended up also<br>
having these lightweight kind of object, hence may be interesting to<br>
eventually consolidate.<span class=""><br></span></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I \
think it is fair to say that there is more interest in fixing performance of GObject \
than there is in introducing a miniobject type. Not sure if that qualifies as \
&#39;interest in lightweight objects&#39; or not.<br></div><div>  \
</div></div><br></div></div>



_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]