[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: freedesktop-xorg-devel
Subject: Re: [PATCH sis] Use miPointerSetPosition, not miPointerAbsoluteCursor
From: Jeremy Huddleston <jeremyhu () apple ! com>
Date: 2011-10-31 6:20:15
Message-ID: 30AEA20D-337A-4001-B97B-A02E24E10D9D () apple ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
Does this need ifdef based on some ABI version?
On Oct 30, 2011, at 22:49, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> Technically this shouldn't just work on the VCP since any master pointer may
> end up in the dead area. However, I suspect the Venn diagramm of MPX users
> and sis merged framebuffer users shows little overlap.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
> ---
> src/sis_driver.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/sis_driver.c b/src/sis_driver.c
> index 7ac9487..9f14cc7 100644
> --- a/src/sis_driver.c
> +++ b/src/sis_driver.c
> @@ -9347,7 +9347,7 @@ SISMergedPointerMoved(int scrnIndex, int x, int y)
> if(doit) {
> UpdateCurrentTime();
> sigstate = xf86BlockSIGIO();
> - miPointerAbsoluteCursor(x, y, currentTime.milliseconds);
> + miPointerSetPosition(inputInfo.pointer, x, y);
> xf86UnblockSIGIO(sigstate);
> return;
> }
> --
> 1.7.7
>
> _______________________________________________
> xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
> Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
> Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
>
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic