[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       freedesktop-xorg-devel
Subject:    Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] xfree86: remove board and vendor identifier
From:       Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-06-30 18:51:42
Message-ID: AANLkTikqcmT2PKVpQ2WaJ4XdVdo3b9c4j93XKUwMtY5K () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 7:12 AM, Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-D/Helsinki)
<tiago.vignatti@nokia.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 03:30:03PM +0200, ext Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 6:07 AM, Vignatti Tiago (Nokia-D/Helsinki)
>> >
>> > I'd say to push the first and second of this set to 1.9, given their
>> > importance. This third one concerns more clean up, so I'll work a bit more,
>> > squash to my tree and eventually we can push later when the merge window is
>> > opened.
>>
>> I don't see any reason to introduce an ABI break for 1.9. We can still
>> get the benefit of not calling the expensive pciaccess functions
>> without causing any superfluous rebuilds.
>
> that's what I meant, isn't? The first two patches don't introduce ABI
> breakage.

Yeah, I was agreeing with putting in the first two patches but not the
third as is.

--
Dan
_______________________________________________
xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development
Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel
Info: http://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]