[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: debian-devel
Subject: New package, name recycling
From: "W. Martin Borgert" <debacle () debian ! org>
Date: 2017-10-20 14:59:58
Message-ID: 20171020165958.Horde.eX2QKy6Gs2V53cR0NOb4tJw () webmail ! in-berlin ! de
[Download RAW message or body]
Hi,
just to be sure, that this is not a problem:
There used to be a package "dino" in Debian until jessie. Upstream
development dried up years ago and dino became extinct.
Recently, a new "dino" appeared on the surface of earth, which is a
completely different program. Like git vs git or node vs node, but
with only one contender.
I would package the new dino under this name, because I don't think
there is a conflict.
Any objections?
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic