[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       debian-devel
Subject:    Re: Survey answers part 3: systemd is not portable and what this means for our ports
From:       Jeremy Bicha <jbicha () ubuntu ! com>
Date:       2013-07-22 12:48:50
Message-ID: CAAajCMaWbUDKK1eA=h2oWqR2L0M2wv-b=CP2OZ1b-f_8hMXUNg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 21 July 2013 20:22, The Wanderer <wanderer@fastmail.fm> wrote:
> I'm saying that it looks to me as if the lock-in to systemd would be
> even stronger than the lock-in to sysvinit, and might well extend to the
> point of even making it harder to implement another new alternative in
> the first place.

So let's never switch to anything better than what we have now unless
we also support 1 or 2 alternatives simultaneously just to be safe. /s

Jeremy


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAAajCMaWbUDKK1eA=h2oWqR2L0M2wv-b=CP2OZ1b-f_8hMXUNg@mail.gmail.com

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]