[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kwin
Subject:    [Bug 160627] Ozone decoration style is superfluous
From:       jorge salgueiro <jorge.salgueiro () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-05-21 14:45:25
Message-ID: 20080521144525.1925.qmail () ktown ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160627         




------- Additional Comments From jorge.salgueiro gmail com  2008-05-21 16:45 -------
"- "abuse of maintainership powers" - it is the responsibility of the maintainer to \
handle things where no consensus can be reached, which apparently was this case; I \
don't see this as I did it because I could, but because I had to "

Is your decision supported by the usability expert, that is in fact the most capable \
person to make such decision or to say "unacceptable for the default"?

If that is the case your're in the right track, if not, your option and decision such \
always be under the umbrella of the usability expert, and a consensus with the art \
team. If not there will be no real possibility to have a coherent visual experience \
in kde 4, and we will end up to be another Frankenstein looking/feeling/experience \
desktop. Because every decision will depend on a random developer, without the \
necessary coordination with a usability expert team. Without a common view on how it \
should feel/look the desktop. We should be like OS X but open. Or do you think that \
every OS X dev agrees with the looks/feeling of OS X? But OS X works because coherent \
decisions are made.

Acts like yours, makes me think that a good looking and coherent experience will \
never be possible in a free software desktop. 


"until the practical ignorance of bug #160117 from the Oxygen side"

Do you read any oxygen blogs?
_______________________________________________
Kwin mailing list
Kwin@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwin


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]