[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: kde-licensing
Subject: Re: A Detailed Analysis of the GPL For KDE/QT
From: Sirtaj Singh Kang <ssk () physics ! unimelb ! edu ! au>
Date: 1998-10-23 14:00:31
[Download RAW message or body]
On Wed, 21 Oct 1998, Raul Miller wrote:
[snip]
> If you provide a xerox service for public use you're obligated to make it
> clear that you're not doing so to violate copyright.
I want to know about this obligation and in which nations it holds. I have
used scores of libraries in perhaps 4 or 5 countries and I have never seen
this "obligatory" warning at or around any of their copiers. Is the
situation dramatically different in the US?
> What other people do which doesn't involve what you do is not your
> responsibility.
Good, now that you've said that, we shall keep it for reference if this
comes up again.
-Taj.
Sirtaj S. Kang taj@kde.org ssk@physics.unimelb.edu.au
School of Physics Univ of Melbourne KDE: The Desktop sans Toga
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic