[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bugs-dist
Subject:    [Bug 190906] spelling does not detect latex commands
From:       <niburu1 () hotmail ! com>
Date:       2010-07-31 22:17:55
Message-ID: 20100731221755.9597756F50 () immanuel ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=190906





--- Comment #6 from  <niburu1 hotmail com>  2010-08-01 00:17:54 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > The fix is not entirely adequate. E.g. \bibliography is not marked as a
> > spelling error but \bibliographystyle, \emph, \lnot, etc. are. It appears
> > there's only a select "few" commands that are being ignored by spell check,  > \
> > but EVERY command should be ignored, i.e. every string of the form '\<command>'.I \
> > imagine this is even easier to implement then creating a "blacklist" of commands \
> > to ignore which is why it surprises me that this  route was not chosen.
> 
> This is exactly what is done.
> 
> Please ensure that you are using (at least) KDE 4.4, and that you are using the
> most recent LaTeX highlighting file (latex.xml). You might also want to delete
> an old version of it in
> 
> $HOME/.kde/share/apps/katepart/syntax/

Ah, I'm using a custom latex.xml file I saved in my local directory so that I
could get syntax highlighting to behave nicely with my dark color scheme. I
suppose I might have to remove that to get spell check to work correctly, but
whether spell check ignores '\...' strings *should* be independent of the
syntax highlighting file. Why is the one dependent on the other?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]