[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bugs-dist
Subject:    [Bug 192442] Allow tags to be used to geolocate images
From:       Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy () goop ! org>
Date:       2009-12-31 22:07:15
Message-ID: 20091231220715.D4C6F2DED9 () immanuel ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=192442


Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jeremy@goop.org




--- Comment #5 from Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy goop org>  2009-12-31 23:07:09 ---
+1

I think associating geographic info with tags is an excellent idea.  I
implemented this in my home-grown photo-management system, and it makes
geo-tagging very straightforward.  I also associated a level of resolution with
each tag (which is simple order of magnitude radius in metres; 10km/1km/100m
etc), so I could roughy tag "London" and then get more specific with particular
images.  

An important part of this is that it is much more general than having a single
"location" embedded in to a picture; I can have multiple locations associated
with an image (such as where I was standing and where the subject is, which is
often quite separated for large landscapes).  However, if I'm setting the
location down to 1-10m resolution, actually setting the photo location is
probably better than encoding it in a tag.

An obvious generalization is to be able to attach arbitrary metadata to tags,
which are then overlaid on any image to which those tags are applied.  I guess
bug #192447 addresses that.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching all bug changes.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]