[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bugs-dist
Subject:    [Bug 143995] add tabs to dolphin
From:       Peter Penz <peter.penz () gmx ! at>
Date:       2008-04-12 6:20:40
Message-ID: 20080412062040.14796.qmail () ktown ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143995         




------- Additional Comments From peter.penz gmx at  2008-04-12 08:20 -------
 Jorden: Thanks for the use cases with the reasoning why split view is no alternative \
for you. This was constructive input and I've added this to my use cases list for \
tabs. Regarding the other topics (Konqueror, release cycle, ...): I got your points, \
but as you said: let's just close this topic here.

 Patcito:
> I don't think konqueror3 tabs config is so terrible (at least
> for the user), it only has two checkbox and an
> "advanced option" button that leads to 7 checkbox.

I did not mean that the Konqueror tabs "configuration", I've meant the number of menu \
entries: Konqueror has a "New Tab" menu entry in "Location" and the entries "New \
Tab", "Duplicate Current Tab", "Detach Current Tab", "Close Current Tab", "Move Tab \
Left", "Move Tab Right" in the "Window" menu.

That are 7 menu entries for one feature and this is something where I have to check \
whether the balance of introducing this feature vs. introducing menu clutter is worth \
to be implemented. My current point of view is that 7 menu entries are not needed for \
tabs (e. g. in Firefox there is only one "New Tab" entry, the rest is done by the \
context menu + drag and drop). This I think could work very well for Dolphin too :-)

I'm not concerned about the number of configuration options: whether there are 2 or \
10 does not matter as long as long as each of the option provides a solution for \
given use cases.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]