[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bugs-dist
Subject:    [Bug 148382] overexposure indication already when fully "saturated"
From:       Arnd Baecker <arnd.baecker () web ! de>
Date:       2007-09-01 12:33:51
Message-ID: 20070901123351.29883.qmail () ktown ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148382         




------- Additional Comments From arnd.baecker web de  2007-09-01 14:33 -------

Currently it is already  possible
to change the colors for over/under exposure.
So this would mean to add two more colors for over-exposure indication?
(do we need the same for under-exposure?, presumably not ...)

Gilles, I do think that individual R, G, B channels can be
overexposed, see e.g. 
""" You need to have a histogram that shows each of the R, G and B
channels. Single channel histograms don't show when just one color 
is overexposed."""
(from http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/yrgb.htm)
Therefore I am not sure whether averaging is the right approach.
Any value 255 could mean that this was 256 or more, clipped to 255.

I still find #4 convincing.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]