[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bugs-dist
Subject:    [Bug 125955] ability to store separate personal information using a
From:       Laszlo Pandy <laszlok2 () gmail ! com>
Date:       2006-04-24 21:59:48
Message-ID: 20060424215948.8903.qmail () ktown ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
         
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125955         




------- Additional Comments From laszlok2 gmail com  2006-04-24 23:59 -------
The whole point of a collection is to store all the data in a quick, easy to access \
place. In this proposed situation, what would happen if one person changed a tag on a \
song. Would each database keep its own metadata or would the change affect all \
collections? If not then you would have basically many collections all merged \
together, and share few if any tables. It just seems it would be a lot easier to make \
several collections then trying to put many in one file? Is there a particular reason \
in your case that you can't just make separate collections?


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]