[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bugs-dist
Subject:    [Bug 56733] Crash on starting juk
From:       Scott Wheeler <wheeler () kde ! org>
Date:       2003-04-02 2:02:35
[Download RAW message or body]

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
     
http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56733     




------- Additional Comments From wheeler@kde.org  2003-04-02 04:02 -------
Subject: Re:  Crash on starting juk

Oops.  ;-)

Correcting that now...

On Wednesday 02 April 2003 3:53, Zack Rusin wrote:
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
>      
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56733     
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From zack@kde.org  2003-04-02 03:53 -------
> Subject: Re:  Crash on starting juk
> 
> On Tuesday 01 April 2003 20:34, you wrote:
> > ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> > You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
> >
> > http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56733
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------- Additional Comments From wheeler@kde.org  2003-04-02 03:34
> > ------- Subject: Re: Crash on starting juk
> >
> > Ok, I just closed this because I'm pretty sure I spotted it and fixed
> > it.  If you're running HEAD can you give it a try?  Otherwise I can
> > send you a patch againt 1.1.
> 
> Sure you got the right bug there? I think you fixed 56687 and not this 
> one. There's no way of testing qdatastream directly for validity but 
> what could be done is creating an empty "invalid" file that would be 
> deleted when cache would have been completely written to "cache" file. 
> If JuK on startup would detect existence of that file it would 
> regenerate the cache.
> Anyway, here's the cache file you asked for :
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Created an attachment (id=1288)
 --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=1288&action=view)
>  --> (http://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=1288&action=view)
> cache
>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]