[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       kde-bugs-dist
Subject:    Bug#44554: marked as done (GPG signature shown as attachment instead of beeing verified) by Ingo =?i
From:       owner () bugs ! kde ! org (Stephan Kulow)
Date:       2002-06-30 21:18:02
[Download RAW message or body]

Your message with subj: Bug#44554: GPG signature shown as attachment instead of \
beeing verified

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 30 June 2002 18:35, runevi@student.matnat.uio.no wrote:
> Kmail shows the gpg signature as an attachment,instead of verifying
> the signature, in this email:

The next version of KMail (in KDE 3.1) will support this kind of 
signatures.

Regards,
Ingo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9H2WQGnR+RTDgudgRAtb1AKDA6Z/X/eb0Lay/tTPL4eAVkmUxrQCfUEnf
S6w3dGNxYNf7QF7MVdXGXLA=
=Wyrq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Stephan Kulow
(administrator, KDE bugs database)

(Complete bug history is available at http://bugs.kde.org/db/44/44554.html)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.kde.org; 30 Jun 2002 16:35:03 +0000
Received: (qmail 8455 invoked by uid 33); 30 Jun 2002 16:35:03 -0000
Date: 30 Jun 2002 16:35:03 -0000
Message-ID: <20020630163503.8454.qmail@mail.kde.org>
To: submit@bugs.kde.org
Subject: GPG signature shown as attachment instead of beeing verified
From: runevi@student.matnat.uio.no
X-KDE-Received: -195.159.107.29

Package:           kmail
Version:           1.4 (using KDE 3.0.1 )
Severity:          normal
Installed from:    SuSE
Compiler:          gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (SuSE)
OS:                Linux (i686) release 2.4.18-4GB
OS/Compiler notes: 

Kmail shows the gpg signature as an attachment,instead of verifying the signature, in \
this email:

-------------------
Return-Path: <current-users-owner-rune=t4m.com@netbsd.org>
Delivered-To: rune@trans4media.com
Received: (qmail 16137 invoked by uid 560); 30 Jun 2002 16:16:50 -0000
Received: from current-users-owner-rune=t4m.com@netbsd.org by obelix.trans4media.com \
with qmail-scanner-0.96 (. Clean. Processed in 0.241971 secs); 30 Jun 2002 16:16:50 \
                -0000
Received: from mail.netbsd.org (155.53.1.253)
  by obelix.t4m.com with SMTP; 30 Jun 2002 16:16:48 -0000
Received: (qmail 10923 invoked by uid 605); 30 Jun 2002 16:16:14 -0000
Delivered-To: current-users@netbsd.org
Received: (qmail 10916 invoked from network); 30 Jun 2002 16:16:13 -0000
Received: from uriel.eclipsed.net (66.92.234.99)
  by mail.netbsd.org with SMTP; 30 Jun 2002 16:16:13 -0000
Received: by uriel.eclipsed.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 406EA49701; Sun, 30 Jun 2002 12:16:12 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2002 12:16:11 -0400
From: gabriel rosenkoetter <gr@eclipsed.net>
To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: 7 days and counting since my last rsync with new revisions....
Message-ID: <20020630161611.GJ908@uriel.eclipsed.net>
Mail-Followup-To: NetBSD-current Discussion List <current-users@NetBSD.ORG>
References: <20020626164755.0E308AC@proven.weird.com> \
                <873cv9kfls.fsf@snark.piermont.com> \
                <20020626195500.01FA6AC@proven.weird.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
  micalg=pgp-sha1;
  protocol="application/pgp-signature";
  boundary="PNftq4k6NuHCGvy8"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020626195500.01FA6AC@proven.weird.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Sender: current-users-owner@netbsd.org
Precedence: list
Status: R 
X-Status: N



On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 03:55:00PM -0400, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> Would more rsync mirrors (or at least one more here in Toronto) help to
> spread the load out?

Only if people actually use them.

--=20
gabriel rosenkoetter
gr@eclipsed.net

[Attachment #3 (application/pgp-signature)]
-----------------------

I'm not sure why this happens, but when content type is "Multipart/signed", shouldn't \
kmail verify the signature?



(Submitted via bugs.kde.org)
(Called from KBugReport dialog)



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]