[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       amarok-bugs-dist
Subject:    [Bug 198180] Reintroduce the Queue Manager
From:       Maik Keller <mk3ll3r () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-04-06 7:46:17
Message-ID: 20100406074617.654223D35A () immanuel ! kde ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198180





--- Comment #13 from Maik Keller <mk3ll3r gmail com>  2010-04-06 09:46:10 ---
I think amarok should integrate a queue manager because it actually provides
more functionality and ease of use than it breaks some kind of philosophy.

Maybe some users don't want to use the collection at all - they just drop
their songs into the playlist and organize them with the queue. Or like I
described in my previous mail you need to deal with some temporary media
which amarok should manage and play but don't add it to the collection
because you don't need it again.

So where is the point against a context menu applet? People who don't like
it can ignore it but other people may enjoy the new possibilities.

To share another idea: create a kind of temporary collection where you can
to drop/search/filter your music which you can flush easiely. This would
basically replace the "messy playlist + queue" method with a "messy
(temporary) collection + playlist".

I look at this like Damijan Nec - something needs to happen because the
actual behavior isn't as user friendly as it can (and should) be.

4. Apr 2010 10:56 vorm. schrieb am "Damijan Bec" <damijan.bec@gmail.com>:

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=198180
--- Comment #12 from Damijan Bec <damijan bec gmail com>  2010-04-04
10:56:20 ---
Hi Marius,

I just wish that something would be done regarding this issue. Queueing used
to
work in Amarok series 1.X. Now is fundamentally broken. Changing song
positions
in the queue is crucial. I do not want to create another playlist because I
already have one. Sigh. Is my workflow really so fundamentally flawed and
rare?

One could potentially change song position within a playlist (if no sorting
is
applied and random mode is off) but the whole point of queueing is _not_to
change your playlist and track changing mode at all.

So may I assume that _nothing_ is going to be done to 'fix' the current not
the
best implemented playlist design?

Cheers

-- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -------
You are receiving this ...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Amarok-bugs-dist mailing list
Amarok-bugs-dist@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/amarok-bugs-dist
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]