[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       zope-cmf
Subject:    Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: [GenericSetup] site profiles vs. extension profiles
From:       Andreas Jung <lists () zopyx ! com>
Date:       2007-03-17 15:09:19
Message-ID: C39DD4F346D67B46725075FF () suxmac2 ! local
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


--On 16. März 2007 11:38:44 -0400 Tres Seaver <tseaver@palladion.com> 
wrote:

>>>
>> Is this intentional?
>
> We are actually working to fix that exact problem here at the BBQ
> sprint.  I will be checking in to this branch today (within the next
> hour or so):
>
>   svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/GenericSetup/branches/tseaver-bbq_sprint
>

This looks much better. However next question: when you create a CMF
Site through the ZMI you have only "CMFDefault site" as setup profile
which is perfectly fine. When you go to portal_setup after creating the site
you'll further baseline profiles like "Plone Site "Simple PAS Content 
Profile"...I assume that this is caused by those profile are registered
for a subclass of ISiteRoot...that might be confusing  a bit..

Andreas
[Attachment #5 (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist  -  Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf

See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]