[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: zope-cmf
Subject: Re: [Zope-CMF] Re: Tools as local utilities
From: Jens Vagelpohl <jens () dataflake ! org>
Date: 2006-09-14 7:13:31
Message-ID: 50B77957-3C64-4632-9FBF-51A0B020A9D0 () dataflake ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 13 Sep 2006, at 13:06, Miles Waller wrote:
>> Personally, I'm neutral on moving the requirement for CMF 2.1 to
>> Zope 2.10. Obviously we're not using any of those new features
>> yet, but it would be nice to enable their use by mandating 2.10.
>> CMF 2.2 will move the bar higher I'd wager.
>> I'd love to hear some kind of yay/nay for making Zope 2.10 the
>> required platform for CMF 2.1 from some other people like Tres,
>> Yvo, Florent etc.
>
> One thing that would be good about this is that the CMFUid suite
> could be deprecated in favour of an implementation based on zope3's
> intids utility.
>
> There was a discussion a while back about the future of that
> package: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-cmf/2006-April/
> 024373.html
Yes, that would be a good thing, CMFUid isn't as "alive" as it was
hoped when the product was pushed into the CMF.
jens
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFFCQEbRAx5nvEhZLIRAugsAJ4pBxmqKlHdlMjiaiJSCVGLRsTIcQCfc7X2
DrrAhYmOiDB8CTbxITFDOhM=
=Nuwz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Zope-CMF maillist - Zope-CMF@lists.zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-cmf
See http://collector.zope.org/CMF for bug reports and feature requests
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic