[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       zope
Subject:    Re: [Zope] Overhead of second instance of Zope
From:       Toby Dickenson <tdickenson () devmail ! geminidataloggers ! co ! uk>
Date:       2004-09-17 14:30:24
Message-ID: 200409171530.24399.tdickenson () devmail ! geminidataloggers ! co ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

On Friday 17 September 2004 15:15, John Poltorak wrote:

> > >How much overhead would a second instance
> > > use just by starting it rather than using it?

Negligible cpu time except for the requests that you throw at it.

A few tens of megabytes of ram, plus whatever objects you load. You can lower 
the zodb cache size to keep fewer objects in ram, if appropriate for your 
tests.

-- 
Toby Dickenson
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist  -  Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
**   No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic