[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: zope
Subject: Re: [Zope] Overhead of second instance of Zope
From: Toby Dickenson <tdickenson () devmail ! geminidataloggers ! co ! uk>
Date: 2004-09-17 14:30:24
Message-ID: 200409171530.24399.tdickenson () devmail ! geminidataloggers ! co ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]
On Friday 17 September 2004 15:15, John Poltorak wrote:
> > >How much overhead would a second instance
> > > use just by starting it rather than using it?
Negligible cpu time except for the requests that you throw at it.
A few tens of megabytes of ram, plus whatever objects you load. You can lower
the zodb cache size to keep fewer objects in ram, if appropriate for your
tests.
--
Toby Dickenson
_______________________________________________
Zope maillist - Zope@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev )
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic