[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       zodb-dev
Subject:    RE: [ZODB-Dev] Status and future of OracleStorage
From:       "Tim Peters" <tim () zope ! com>
Date:       2005-04-02 19:23:55
Message-ID: 20050402192357.ABAF83B8038 () smtp ! zope ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Tim Peters]
>> Of course "rev=1" makes it show the first version ever created.

[Toby Dickenson]
> "rev=1" shows the latest version on the branch with numeric ids "1.x".
> that is, the trunk. Thats definitely true for the version of viewcvs we
> use here, and seems to be true the version on cvs.zope.org right now.

>> The most up-to-date version today happens to be this:
>>
>>     http://cvs.zope.org/ZODB3/Doc/storages.html?rev=1.8.4.2

> So the latest on that branch would always be:
> http://cvs.zope.org/ZODB3/Doc/storages.html?rev=1.8.4

I gladly yield to anyone on WTF rev= might do.


> Any interest in keeping this table going, in svn or elsewhere?

The table is still alive from my POV, although I don't know enough about
DirectoryStorage or APE to keep it current.   Since all external references
I know about point at the CVS repository (e.g., the ZODB Wiki, and your
DirectoryStorage home page on SourceForge), I just merged the
Zope-2_7-branch changes back to the trunk, so that external rev=1 references
show the most recent info again.

Copying that file to yet another repository would just guarantee that
assorted copies get out of synch.  When/if cvs.zope.org stops serving the
file, that would be a good time to move it elsewhere.

_______________________________________________
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/

ZODB-Dev mailing list  -  ZODB-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]