[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       zlib-devel
Subject:    [Zlib-devel] Visual studio 2008 - amd64 - adm performance
From:       vtorri () univ-evry ! fr (Vincent Torri)
Date:       2010-02-27 16:44:12
Message-ID: Pine.LNX.4.64.1002271738160.21384 () grozny ! maths ! univ-evry ! fr
[Download RAW message or body]


Hey,

> On Feb 23, 2010, at 10:13 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> > would it be possible to add benchmark and unit tests ? adding rules like 'check' \
> > and 'bench' that launches tests and benchmarks ? I think that unit tests must be \
> > added if the asm and parralel compression are valid or not. 
> > About unit tests, i have written a very small "framework" that you can use if you \
> > want.
> 
> Vincent,
> 
> I would consider that for the next version (not 1.2.4).  Yes, tell me about your \
> framework.

look here:

http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/browser/trunk/PROTO/evil/src/bin

The files are evil_suite.c, evil_suite.h and evil_test*.(c/h). Forget 
about the Windows stuff in evil_suite.c, it's for one of the tests. It 
depends on nothing and is very simple. You can improve it if you want, of 
course. The licence is BSD like.

If you want something more solid, with a lot more features, look at the 
'check' library (http://check.sourceforge.net/).

> I have a bunch of tests I run, but they depend on a large set of input 
> and output data that I obviously wouldn't want to make part of a normal 
> distribution.  Also some of the data is proprietary.
> 
> Perhaps a test suite would require the user to separately download 
> things like the Calgary corpus and enwik8 if they want to run the tests.

In that case, yes, something that can be downloaded apart zlib is better.

Vincent Torri


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]