'Re: [zeromq-dev] =?windows-1251?q?=CD=C0=3A__s390x_build_failure?='

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List: zeromq-dev
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] =?windows-1251?q?=CD=C0=3A__s390x_build_failure?=
From: Neale Ferguson <neale () sinenomine ! net>
Date: 2012-04-25 14:28:31
Message-ID: CBBD824F.13FFC%neale () sinenomine ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

It=92s weird. If I run it via make check or just .libs/lt-test_term_endpoin=
t the return code from zmq_send() is 3. However, if I use gdb to step throu=
gh everything to see what=92s being returned at each stage, it=92s =961 (as=
 expected). Bizarre.

On 4/23/12 5:02 PM, "Sergey Hripchenko" <shripchenko@intermedia.net> wrote:

Is it was latest trunk?
Could you please re-run it to see if it is 100% reproducible?
Could I ask everyone to test it too?
Strange, that all my 'make check's are passed.
(I'm on a debian linux by the way)

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1251"><title>Re: \
[zeromq-dev] ??: &nbsp;s390x build failure</title> </head>
<body>
It’s \
weird. If I run it via make check or just .libs/lt-test_term_endpoint the return code \
from zmq_send() is 3. However, if I use gdb to step through everything to see what’s \
being returned at each stage, it’s –1 (as expected). Bizarre. 
 
On 4/23/12 5:02 PM, &quot;Sergey Hripchenko&quot; &lt;<a \
href="shripchenko@intermedia.net">shripchenko@intermedia.net</a>&gt; wrote: 
<blockquote>Is it was latest trunk? Could you please re-run it to see \
if it is 100% reproducible? Could I ask everyone to test it too? 
Strange, that all my 'make check's are passed. 
(I'm on a debian linux by the way)</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

_______________________________________________
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

--===============3738099412001347349==--

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 