[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       zebra
Subject:    [zebra 20120] Re: preventing advertisement of certain interfaces
From:       John Fraizer <zebra () EnterZone ! Net>
Date:       2003-07-31 23:55:44
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Amit Kucheria wrote:

> "no redistribute connected" seems to be having unwanted results.
> 
> consider three interfaces on the router:
> 
> eth0: 192.168.1.0/24, not advertised
> eth1: 10.1.0.0/16, passive-interface
> eth2: 10.100.0.0/16
> 
> The router should *NOT* advertise 192.168.1.0/24
> The router should advertise 10.1.0.0/16 and 10.100.0.0/16.
> Obviously these advertisements will be only on eth2, since eth1 is
> passive and eth0 isn't involved in routing.
> 
> "no redistribute connected" has the unwanted behavior of not advertising
> 10.1.0.0/16
> 
> Hope this makes the problem clearer?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> /Amit


10.1.0.0/16 is actually a "connected" interface.  It doesn't matter if
it's "passive" or not.  It is still a "connected" interface.

---
John Fraizer              | High-Security Datacenter Services |
President                 | Dedicated circuits 64k - 155M OC3 |
EnterZone, Inc            | Virtual, Dedicated, Colocation    |
http://www.enterzone.net/ | Network Consulting Services       |



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]