[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       zebra
Subject:    [zebra 11027] Re: First Time to ospf  (Long mail)
From:       bino () indoakses-online ! com
Date:       2001-10-31 12:00:18
[Download RAW message or body]

Dear All
On Wed, 31 October 2001, John Fraizer wrote:
> On 31 Oct 2001 bino@indoakses-online.com wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 31 October 2001, John Fraizer wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > Um, it is the SAME path length from your station to RTR-C eth2
> > I didn't do the ping from "my station".
> > I did it from RTR-A ... So the shortest path to 172.17.1.1 (RTR-C Eth1) is via  \
> > 192.168.1.1 (RTR-C eth0). 
> > Note : The netw map and configuration file are in  [zebra 11015]
> > 
> > sincerely
> > -bino-
> > 
> > IndoAkses
> > PAINLESS WIRELESS
> > 
> 
> 
> It might be the shortest path as far as that /32 is concerned but, for
> 172.17.1.0/24, it is equal distance to it via either router-B or
> router-C.  Remember: That /24 lives on BOTH router-B and router-C.
> 
> If there was a router-D that lived somewhere behind router-C and you were
> taking the B-C-D path for a network that router-d was advertizing, THAT
> would be a problem but, what you're describing is NOT a problem.  I don't
> remember off-hand how OSPF breaks ties like that (and I don't feel like
> looking it up) but, it looks like router-A has both the lowest IP address
> and the highest IP address with reference to router-c.
> 
> 


Ok Ok ....
I Put the forth router ... so there is RTR A/B/C/D
This time I try to set "area id" to "0" for all trunk.

It work fine.

Sincerely
-bino-


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]