[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       xsl-list
Subject:    Re: [xsl] What are the best XSLT 1 or XSLT 2 performance benchmarks
From:       Kevin Jones <kjouk () yahoo ! co ! uk>
Date:       2010-01-23 12:07:10
Message-ID: 4B5AE66E.1030409 () yahoo ! co ! uk
[Download RAW message or body]

I was never a fan of XSLTMark because a lot of samples have a very 
synthetic nature, although it didn't help that it was released by a 
competitor at the time. As an alternative I created XSLTBench from 
example uses gathered around the web in 2001, this is still the main 
performance benchmark used on the Intel processors although we extended 
it a couple of years back and also have a lot of customer cases we 
benchmark against as well. You can find copies of XSLTBench around 
although there is no official distribution point anymore.

For XSLT 2.0 we currently use a modified form of XSLTBench, we expect 
the comparison between 1.0 & 2.0 to be useful but we also expect that a 
2.0 processor will be marginally slower on these samples.  Of course 
there will also be samples where 2.0 does better but this is not yet the 
focus of our work. If anyone is interested in the XSLTBench samples, 
send me an email at kevin dot jones at intel dot com and I will see what 
we can do to release them.

Regards
Kev
Intel SOA Expressway team

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe@lists.mulberrytech.com>
--~--

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]