[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       xsl-list
Subject:    Re: [xsl] Naming conventions for xsl/xslt stylesheets
From:       "Mukul Gandhi" <gandhi.mukul () gmail ! com>
Date:       2007-01-30 16:35:17
Message-ID: 7870f82e0701300823x58bb4ef5pd89db676a097f296 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I think technically, you can have any extension for your XSLT files
(except you should avoid using extensions used by popular softwares -
like .doc, .xls etc).

But I think it's a good practice to name pure XSLT files with .xslt
extension. .xsl extension is normally used for files having XSLT +
XSL-FO code.

(but personally, I use extension .xsl even for pure XSLT files -- as
it doesn't really matter, and I can type file names quickly).

On 1/30/07, Ben Stover <bxstover@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> just a questions concerning the naming conventions for XSLT stylesheets:
>
> Do XSL stylesheets ALWAYS have to be in a file with filen name extension *.xsl ?
>
> What about XSLT docs in *.xslt or even in *.xml files?
>
> Is there a must on how to name XSLT stylesheets or only a recommendation ?
>
> Are there differences in handling between XSLT 1.x and 2.0 versions ?
>
> Ben


-- 
Regards,
Mukul Gandhi

--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe@lists.mulberrytech.com>
--~--


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic