[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: xmonad
Subject: Re: [xmonad] What to do without Google Code
From: Francesco Ariis <fa-ml () ariis ! it>
Date: 2015-03-13 23:35:30
Message-ID: 20150313233530.GA21754 () x60s ! casa
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:38:53PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> you might have heard the news: Google Code is going to shut down:
> http://google-opensource.blogspot.de/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html
>
> So we'll have to start looking for an alternative bugtracker.
Hi Joachim,
there have been some messages stemming from a previous thread [1]
(which I almost lost due to unrelated title, so maybe for archive-cleanness'
sake the discussion could continue on this one?). A recap of the questions on
the table:
- Where to relocate the bug-tracker?
Mentioned: - hub.darcs.net (supports darcs, forks, issues)
- github.com (ubiquitus)
- phabricator.haskell.org (used by GHC)
- Should xmonad switch from darcs to git/mercurial?
Mentioned: - no (darcs is clear and easy)
- yes (git attracts more contributions)
- let's make a git mirror
- What about our patch review system?
Mentioned: - phabricator.haskell.org (GHC, more structured)
- leave it as it is, patches/discussions in the ML (crude
but working and with a clear review history)
- leave it as it it + something to monitor the ML, like
darcswatch (closed now!) or Patchwork (used by lkml/git)
Hope I didn't mangle other people's thoughts that much!
[1] http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/2015-March/014628.html
["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
_______________________________________________
xmonad mailing list
xmonad@haskell.org
http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic