[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: xmlrpc-user
Subject: Re: Is M10 release possible?
From: Sagara Gunathunga <sagara.gunathunga () gmail ! com>
Date: 2015-07-18 23:06:30
Message-ID: CANzUfzcsceFK=6_Zrpy4rL0AiRp_8wxd-6nrt7vOeMKZpnXMXQ () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Andreas Veithen <andreas.veithen@gmail.com>
wrote:
> OK. That regression is now fixed.
>
> @Sagara: to continue working on the release, I need JIRA admin rights
> for the WODEN project.
>
Granted, can you please check ?
Thanks !
>
> Andreas
>
> On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Andreas Veithen
> <andreas.veithen@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Confirmed. There are indeed regressions:
> >
> > http://ws.apache.org/woden-staging/w3c-tests/results/Interchange.html
> >
> > Three of the test failures didn't occur with 1.0M9.
> >
> > Andreas
> >
> > On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Andreas Veithen
> > <andreas.veithen@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Andreas Veithen
> >> <andreas.veithen@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Sagara Gunathunga
> >>> <sagara.gunathunga@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Veithen <
> andreas.veithen@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there will be
> >>>>> one. I would like to simplify the release process for Woden, and I
> >>>>> have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the documentation from
> Forrest
> >>>>> to Maven.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> In fact I have started some preparation for Woden 1.0 release but had
> to on
> >>>> hold due to some other priorities I hope I can continue my works again
> >>>> middle of this week .
> >>>>
> >>>> BTW It seems Woden code base is still in JDK 1.4 level, it would be
> better
> >>>> if we can move into Java 5 or 6. But I doubt which one of followings
> is the
> >>>> best choice at this time.
> >>>>
> >>>> Option 1- As we are keep delaying Axis2 1.7, release Woden code
> with JDK
> >>>> 1.4 level support, down side of this option is we never know whether
> this
> >>>> could be the very last Woden release.
> >>>>
> >>>> Option 2- Move Woden code into Java 5( or 6) , down side of this
> approach
> >>>> is this will delay Axis2 1.7 release.
> >>>>
> >>>> I would like see others thoughts.
> >>>
> >>> I would go for option 1. We shouldn't delay the Axis2 1.7 release and
> >>> I don't see why there wouldn't be another Woden release, in particular
> >>> if we try simplifying the release process.
> >>>
> >>>> @Andreas, great to hear that you have patch to move documentation
> from
> >>>> Forrest to Maven something I really wanted to do but couldn't find
> enough
> >>>> time.
> >>>
> >>> I committed the patch. Note that I migrated the site _sources_. The
> >>> generated site apparently has some manual changes which would be lost
> >>> if we republish it now from the migrated sources (svn log
> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/woden/). Some of
> >>> them were done by you, I guess because you were in the same situation
> >>> as everybody else here, namely not having any idea how this Forrest
> >>> thing works :-). If you get some time it would be great if you could
> >>> review these changes and if necessary reintegrate them into the
> >>> sources. I think that once this is done, it should be fairly easy to
> >>> make this project releasable using a straightforward release process
> >>> such as the one I use for Axiom.
> >>
> >> That statement was probably too optimistic. There is some more work
> >> required. I think we also have another problem, namely that the report
> >> produced by the W3C test suite suggests that there are regressions.
> >>
> >>>> Thanks !
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Andreas
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <redmitry@list.ru> wrote:
> >>>>> > Hello,
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like:
> >>>>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled.
> >>>>> > Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like M10 with
> >>>>> > already
> >>>>> > incorporated fixes?
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Kind regards,
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Dmitry
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >>>>> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@ws.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Sagara Gunathunga
> >>>>
> >>>> Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
> >>>> Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
> >>>> LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
>
--
Sagara Gunathunga
Blog - http://ssagara.blogspot.com
Web - http://people.apache.org/~sagara/
LinkedIn - http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
[Attachment #3 (text/html)]
<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jul \
19, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Andreas Veithen <span dir="ltr"><<a \
href="mailto:andreas.veithen@gmail.com" \
target="_blank">andreas.veithen@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote \
class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc \
solid;padding-left:1ex">OK. That regression is now fixed.<br> <br>
@Sagara: to continue working on the release, I need JIRA admin rights<br>
for the WODEN project.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Granted, can you please \
check ?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks ! </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" \
style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <br>
Andreas<br>
<br>
On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Andreas Veithen<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><<a \
href="mailto:andreas.veithen@gmail.com">andreas.veithen@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br> \
> Confirmed. There are indeed regressions:<br> ><br>
> <a href="http://ws.apache.org/woden-staging/w3c-tests/results/Interchange.html" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://ws.apache.org/woden-staging/w3c-tests/results/Interchange.html</a><br>
><br>
> Three of the test failures didn't occur with 1.0M9.<br>
><br>
> Andreas<br>
><br>
> On Sun, Jul 5, 2015 at 7:21 PM, Andreas Veithen<br>
> <<a href="mailto:andreas.veithen@gmail.com">andreas.veithen@gmail.com</a>> \
wrote:<br> >> On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 10:24 PM, Andreas Veithen<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:andreas.veithen@gmail.com">andreas.veithen@gmail.com</a>> \
wrote:<br> >>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Sagara Gunathunga<br>
>>> <<a href="mailto:sagara.gunathunga@gmail.com">sagara.gunathunga@gmail.com</a>> \
wrote:<br> >>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Andreas Veithen <<a \
href="mailto:andreas.veithen@gmail.com">andreas.veithen@gmail.com</a>><br> \
>>>> wrote:<br> >>>>><br>
>>>>> We need a new Woden release for Axis2 1.7.0 anyway, so there \
will be<br> >>>>> one. I would like to simplify the release process \
for Woden, and I<br> >>>>> have a patch in the pipeline to migrate the \
documentation from Forrest<br> >>>>> to Maven.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> In fact I have started some preparation for Woden 1.0 release but \
had to on<br> >>>> hold due to some other priorities I hope I can \
continue my works again<br> >>>> middle of this week .<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> BTW It seems Woden code base is still in JDK 1.4 level, it would be \
better<br> >>>> if we can move into Java 5 or 6. But I doubt which one of \
followings is the<br> >>>> best choice at this time.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Option 1- As we are keep delaying Axis2 1.7, release Woden code \
with JDK<br> >>>> 1.4 level support, down side of this option is we \
never know whether this<br> >>>> could be the very last Woden \
release.<br> >>>><br>
>>>> Option 2- Move Woden code into Java 5( or 6) , down side of this \
approach<br> >>>> is this will delay Axis2 1.7 release.<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> I would like see others thoughts.<br>
>>><br>
>>> I would go for option 1. We shouldn't delay the Axis2 1.7 release \
and<br> >>> I don't see why there wouldn't be another Woden release, \
in particular<br> >>> if we try simplifying the release process.<br>
>>><br>
>>>> @Andreas, great to hear that you have patch to move \
documentation from<br> >>>> Forrest to Maven something I really wanted to \
do but couldn't find enough<br> >>>> time.<br>
>>><br>
>>> I committed the patch. Note that I migrated the site _sources_. The<br>
>>> generated site apparently has some manual changes which would be \
lost<br> >>> if we republish it now from the migrated sources (svn log<br>
>>> <a href="http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/woden/" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/website/woden/</a>). \
Some of<br> >>> them were done by you, I guess because you were in the same \
situation<br> >>> as everybody else here, namely not having any idea how \
this Forrest<br> >>> thing works :-). If you get some time it would be great \
if you could<br> >>> review these changes and if necessary reintegrate them \
into the<br> >>> sources. I think that once this is done, it should be \
fairly easy to<br> >>> make this project releasable using a straightforward \
release process<br> >>> such as the one I use for Axiom.<br>
>><br>
>> That statement was probably too optimistic. There is some more work<br>
>> required. I think we also have another problem, namely that the report<br>
>> produced by the W3C test suite suggests that there are regressions.<br>
>><br>
>>>> Thanks !<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> Andreas<br>
>>>>><br>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:00 PM, Dmitry <<a \
href="mailto:redmitry@list.ru">redmitry@list.ru</a>> wrote:<br> \
>>>>> > Hello,<br> >>>>> ><br>
>>>>> > The current Woden snapshot has many fixes like:<br>
>>>>> > <a href="https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WODEN-234</a><br>
>>>>> ><br>
>>>>> > On the other hand the Woden development looks stalled.<br>
>>>>> > Is there any chance to have some intermediate release like \
M10 with<br> >>>>> > already<br>
>>>>> > incorporated fixes?<br>
>>>>> ><br>
>>>>> > Kind regards,<br>
>>>>> ><br>
>>>>> > Dmitry<br>
>>>>> ><br>
>>>>> > \
---------------------------------------------------------------------<br> \
>>>>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <a \
href="mailto:dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org">dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org</a><br> \
>>>>> > For additional commands, e-mail: <a \
href="mailto:dev-help@ws.apache.org">dev-help@ws.apache.org</a><br> \
>>>>> ><br> >>>>><br>
>>>>> \
---------------------------------------------------------------------<br> \
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <a \
href="mailto:dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org">dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org</a><br> \
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: <a \
href="mailto:dev-help@ws.apache.org">dev-help@ws.apache.org</a><br> \
>>>>><br> >>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>><br>
>>>> --<br>
>>>> Sagara Gunathunga<br>
>>>><br>
>>>> Blog - <a href="http://ssagara.blogspot.com" \
rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://ssagara.blogspot.com</a><br> >>>> \
Web - <a href="http://people.apache.org/~sagara/" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">http://people.apache.org/~sagara/</a><br> >>>> LinkedIn - \
<a href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara" rel="noreferrer" \
target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara</a><br> \
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div \
class="gmail_signature">Sagara Gunathunga<br><br>Blog - <a \
href="http://ssagara.blogspot.com" \
target="_blank">http://ssagara.blogspot.com</a><br>Web - <a \
href="http://people.apache.org/~sagara/" \
target="_blank">http://people.apache.org/~sagara/</a><br>LinkedIn - <a \
href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara" \
target="_blank">http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara</a></div> </div></div>
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic