[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       xmlrpc-user
Subject:    Re: FW: Problem with DTD Fetching
From:       Brian Ferris <bdferris () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-06-18 15:30:32
Message-ID: AANLkTikJtB_fmQpcqBQ7kAGYJKIjMfVM0VLg7Z4_pvSH () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


I'm having the same issue as David.  I see no way of registering an XML
Catalog entity resolver as Apache XML-RPC provides no extension point for
getting at the xml parser factory method.

I'm willing to write a patch to expose the parser in some fashion.  Is this
something that would be considered?  Are we missing some other way of
registering an XML Catalog entity resolver?

This is a complete blocker for me in the meantime.

Thanks,
Brian


On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Bruno Antunes <bema@dei.uc.pt> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Could anyone tell me if it is possible to use a XML Catalog Resolver with
> the Apache XML-RPC implementation? And in case it is, how can I do that?
>
> I would appreciate any help, since I have no ideas on how to overcome the
> W3C block on DTD files.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Bruno Antunes
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bruno Antunes [mailto:bema@dei.uc.pt]
> Sent: quarta-feira, 14 de Abril de 2010 19:34
> To: xmlrpc-dev@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Problem with DTD Fetching
>
> Hi,
>
> Sorry if I'm bothering you with silly questions.
>
> I want to connect to the Bugzilla XML-RPC API using the Apache XML-RPC
> Implementation. I could get things working a few weeks ago, but since a few
> days ago I'm constantly getting the following exception message:
>
> (...)
> Caused by: java.io.IOException: Server returned HTTP response code: 503 for
> URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd
> (...)
>
> As far as I could investigate, this happens because W3C is blocking access
> to the DTD files because of the excessive requests on it.
>
> I've been searching the web for a solution a long time now and I couldn't
> advance any further on this.
>
> Could you guys give me some lights on how to solve this problem?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Bruno
>
>
>


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]