[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       xmlrpc-user
Subject:    RE: static mehods in handlers
From:       Michael Pitoniak <pitoniakm () msn ! com>
Date:       2009-04-28 22:07:35
Message-ID: BAY103-W2481AD15B1B477F0669005A76E0 () phx ! gbl
[Download RAW message or body]


Jochen,

 I am embarassed to say that i was actually using xmlrpc-2.0.jar....failed to \
recognize the fact that this was a new release of the 3.0 version, and not an update \
to the one i am using.

 That being said, the 2.0 version allowed for static methods to be used in \
handlers...is it not possible to do this under 3.0? I suspect that there is probably \
a good reason for this, and have begun to move my static methods over to instance \
versions.

Thanks for any guidance.

mike

> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:15:51 +0200
> Subject: Re: static mehods in handlers
> From: jochen.wiedmann@gmail.com
> To: xmlrpc-dev@ws.apache.org
> CC: mpitonia@enterasys.com
> 
> Hi, Michael,
> 
> I have compared versions 3.1.1 and 3.1.2, and cannot find any
> difference in the handler mapping and the related classes. Can you
> provide an example? Which exact version have you been using before?
> 
> Jochen
> 
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Pitoniak, Michael
> <mpitonia@enterasys.com> wrote:
> > Greetings,
> > 
> > In the previous release I heavily leveraged static methods in handlers. This does \
> > not appear to be supported in the latest release, as \
> > PropertyHandlerMapping.addHandler() does not add static methods. Is there a work \
> > around for this? 
> > Thx,
> > 
> > mike
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Don't trust a government that doesn't trust you.



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]