[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       xmlrpc-user
Subject:    RE: Viewing handshake certificates
From:       Ranganath Udupa <ranganath.udupa () mail ! mcgill ! ca>
Date:       2004-11-12 22:02:54
Message-ID: 1100296974.4195330ec810f () webmail ! mcgill ! ca
[Download RAW message or body]


Daniel,

My compiler gives me an error saying that the method isn't defined. So I =
guess it hasn't been implemented.

Thanks all the same.
Udupa


-----Original Message-----
From:   Daniel [mailto:dantest@yorku.ca]
Sent:   Fri 12/11/2004 4:50 PM
To:     xmlrpc-user@ws.apache.org
Cc:=09
Subject:        Re: Viewing handshake certificates

Hi,

I'm not an expert but I believe the provider should have implemented =
that
method so try calling it to get the cert info.

Regards,
Daniel

On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, Ranganath Udupa wrote:

>
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to build a secure peer to peer shell program that can talk =
to each
> other using xml-rpc. Each peer is can interact with only a valid set =
of
> peers...and validation of peers is done using an identity certificate =
(x.509v3
> based). I have been able to establish a secure xml-rpc calls and the =
ssl
> handshakes are happening smoothly. One of the peers would be using the
> SecureWebServer class and the other peer connects to it using the =
XmlRpcClient.
> I have also been able to look at the client's certificate from the =
server (by
> tweaking the xml-rpc source code a bit).This has been possible by =
referencing
> the socket that got created during the run() method defined within the
> WebServer class. However, from the client's side, I do not know how it =
would be
> possible for me to view the servers certificate. I am passing a type =
URL to
> establish connection and there is no way I can reference the socket =
that was
> used. Matter of fact, HttpsURLConnection has an abstract method
> getServerCertificates() but there is no implementation available. Any =
help
> regarding this would be very much appreciated.
>
> Hope I have been clear.
>
> Thanks a lot
> Udupa
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]