[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       xmlrpc-user
Subject:    Re: java.policy...
From:       Daniel Rall <dlr () finemaltcoding ! com>
Date:       2002-12-04 22:44:06
[Download RAW message or body]

Luis Fernandez <luis@neofis.com> writes:

> Thanks
> 
> The problem is solved with the cvs version. Can be considered stable? 
> A note on the web about it should a be very good tip.

Excellent.  The code itself is stable, but the interfaces may be
a'changing in future releases.

> Is there currently a webmaster?

There are a few of us with access to www.apache.org.  If you're up to
updating the appropriate XML document from the xdocs/ directory and
submit your change as a patch, I'll push your change live to the web
site.

- Dan

> >"Luis Fernandez" <luis@neofis.com> writes:
> >
> >
> 
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >> This is my first post to the list, so I want first of all say
> >> "hello everybody, and good job!"
> 
> >>
> >> I am developing a xml-rpc client which is an applet. I use for the
> >> server side the built-in xml-rpc server in a unprivilleged port
> >> (8090) and the applet is in normal web server that relies on the
> >> same host, but on diferent port (80).
> 
> >>
> >> When I test the applet, it gives to me a security exception, and i
> >> solve it editing the java.policy file on the client machine to give
> >> permissions in this way:
> 
> >>
> >>grant codeBase "http://127.0.0.1/-" {
> >>  permission java.security.AllPermission;
> >>};
> >>
> >> Is it necessary? i mean, should i edit all the java.policy file in
> >> all the final clients, or there is another way?
> 
> >>
> 
> >
> >I assume you're using our XML-RPC client.  Some previous releases of
> >the client referenced code from the com.sun.* packages, which I
> >believe are inaccessible to applets w/out a policy file (you'd have to
> >search the mailing list archives for exact details).  I seem to recall
> >this being for the base64 library.  What version of the client are you
> >using?
> >
> >Also, have you given the latest from CVS a try?
> >
> >
> 
> >>Sorry for my poor english...
> >>
> 
> >
> >Your english is better than that of a lot of native speakers!
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]