[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       xmlbeans-dev
Subject:    [jira] Resolved: (XMLBEANS-182) No addNew... for simple nested sequence elements
From:       "Johannes Stamminger (JIRA)" <xmlbeans-dev () xml ! apache ! org>
Date:       2005-07-22 13:20:53
Message-ID: 1730480652.1122038453632.JavaMail.jira () ajax ! apache ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-182?page=all ]
     
Johannes Stamminger resolved XMLBEANS-182:
------------------------------------------

    Resolution: Invalid

My fault, it's too late on a friday afternoon. The FixedValue is a union and may be \
set with the setter directly ...

> No addNew... for simple nested sequence elements
> ------------------------------------------------
> 
> Key: XMLBEANS-182
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-182
> Project: XMLBeans
> Type: Bug
> Components: Compiler
> Versions: Version 2
> Environment: Observed for schema attached to XMLBEANS-120 \
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12310698/SpaceSystem.xsd with \
>                 XMLBeans 2.0.0 final. 
> Reporter: Johannes Stamminger
> Priority: Minor

> 
> I miss method IntegerValueType#addNewFixedValue()LFixedIntegerValueType for the \
> schema referenced above. There are methods addNewDynamicValue and \
> addNewDiscreteLookupList as expected. Schema definition of that is:
> 		<choice>
> 			<element name="FixedValue" type="xtce:FixedIntegerValueType"/>
> 			<element name="DynamicValue">
> 				<annotation>
> 					<documentation>Uses a parameter  to for the value.  The parameter value may be \
> optionally adjusted by a Linear function or use a series of boolean expressions to \
> lookup the value.  Anything more complex and a DynamicValue with a CustomAlgorithm \
> may be used  </documentation>  </annotation>
> 				<complexType>
> 					<sequence>
> ...
> The error causing difference seems to be the "complexity" of the nested element. \
> Having only specified the type leads to missing addNew... methods. Having more this \
> problem is not existing. I had a look to same constructs at different places in the \
> schema and the addNew... methods are missing there, too. Workaround is to use here \
> to use construct with setFixedValue(FixedIntegerValueType.Factory.newInstance()), \
> therefore it is IMHO no major issue.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@xmlbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@xmlbeans.apache.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]