[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       xmlbeans-dev
Subject:    RE: Enhancements to Validator
From:       Dutta Satadip <s-dutta () sbcglobal ! net>
Date:       2004-01-25 8:39:57
Message-ID: 20040125083957.26928.qmail () web80411 ! mail ! yahoo ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hello !!
Some of the changes made to the validator ( to get better messages during schema \
validation ) has been checked in the v2 tree.Based on the email earlier, these \
changes might be useful for you. You might want to try and see if the new messages \
work for you.  
Further feedback for enhancements is always welcome.
With Regards
Dutta:)


Dmitri.Colebatch@toyota.com.au wrote:

Dutta,

I'll add our requirements, although I'm not sure whether they fit with what
you're expecting... My biggest issue atm is that when we have a type of

top
a (required)
b (optional)
c (optional)
d (required)
e (required)

and we get xml like:







iirc the current message says "element e not allowed here" which is
correct, but what would be better would be "e found instead of b|c|d" or
something similar. I could imagine that there's a fair bit of work to make
this happen, and to be honest I'm now used to the current messages, so it
wouldn't bother me that much.

my 2c.

cheers
dim





"Murphy, Eric" 
rcan.gc.ca> 
cc: 
21/01/2004 05:23 AM Subject: RE: Enhancements to Validator 
Please respond to 
xmlbeans-user 


[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

<DIV>
<DIV>Hello !!</DIV>
<DIV>Some of the changes made to the validator ( to get better messages during schema \
validation&nbsp;)&nbsp;has been checked in the v2 tree.Based on the email earlier, \
these changes&nbsp;might be useful for you. You might want to try and see if the new \
messages work for you.</DIV> <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Further feedback for enhancements is always welcome.</DIV>
<DIV>With Regards</DIV>
<DIV>Dutta:)</DIV>
<DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Dmitri.Colebatch@toyota.com.au</I></B> wrote:</DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: \
#1010ff 2px solid"><BR>Dutta,<BR><BR>I'll add our requirements, although I'm not sure \
whether they fit with what<BR>you're expecting... My biggest issue atm is that when \
we have a type of<BR><BR>top<BR>a (required)<BR>b (optional)<BR>c (optional)<BR>d \
(required)<BR>e (required)<BR><BR>and we get xml \
like:<BR><BR><TOP><BR><A><BR><B><BR><E /><BR></TOP><BR><BR>iirc the current message \
says "element e not allowed here" which is<BR>correct, but what would be better would \
be "e found instead of b|c|d" or<BR>something similar. I could imagine that there's a \
fair bit of work to make<BR>this happen, and to be honest I'm now used to the current \
messages, so it<BR>wouldn't bother me that much.<BR><BR>my \
2c.<BR><BR>cheers<BR>dim<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>"Murphy, Eric" \
<BR><ERIMURPH@PFC.CFS.N <br ??xmlbeans-user@xml.apache.org?? To:>rcan.gc.ca&gt; \
<XMLBEANS-USER@XML.APACHE.ORG><BR>cc: <BR>21/01/2004 05:23 AM Subject:  RE: \
Enhancements to Validator <BR>Please respond to <BR>xmlbeans-user \
<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></B></A></DIV>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]